Skip to main content

Wright v. Wright

Citations

  • 431 So. 2d 177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • findings and judgment of trial court come to appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed in the absence of a record demonstrating error
  • findings and judgment of the trial court come to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed in the absence of a record demonstrating error
  • no transcript of hearing on final judgment of dissolution on appeal from that judgment
  • the findings and judgments of the lower tribunal come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and the appellant has the burden of submitting an adequate record to support his appeal
  • “[I]f a case is considered worthy of litigating, it follows that the testimony adduced before the trier of fact should be reported and transcribed so that the appellate court could have before it a record for its consideration in the event an appeal is deemed necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank D. Upchurch, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.