Skip to main content
· 10/5/2015

Wright v. Wingard

Citations

  • 136 S. Ct. 241
  • 193 L. Ed. 2d 180
  • 84 U.S.L.W. 3172
  • 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting no documentation that Plaintiff needed an ambulatory device, and that Plaintiff often experienced low levels of pain, could stretch without issue, prepared his own meals, walked, and could regularly lift ten-to-fifteen pounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.