Wright v. Wilcox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the con- tention that the trial court should have set aside a $22,000 nominal damages award based on the argument that it was an excessive award as a matter of law where there were no allegations or evi- dence of mistake or prejudice by the jury
• award of $22,000 in nominal damages was not excessive as a matter of law
• jury award of $22,000 in nominal damages for trespass was not excessive
• discussing nominal and general damages available in trespass actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).