Wright v. Vermont & Massachusetts Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that repetition of the improper argument likely meant the jury gave it more weight and suggested the prosecutor believed it was not trivial
• where appeal had been filed and fully briefed by another criminal defendant challenging similar statements made by the same prosecutor, remarks in later case “may have been a calculated strategy deployed by this prosecutor”
• improper arguments made repeatedly were prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).