Wright v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that relevant federal regulations and statutes did not give rise to a money-mandating fiduciary relationship because of the extremely limited role played by the government in leasing and permitting of allotted Indian land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Navajo Nation v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2000-02-04· cited 28×
• Osage Tribe of Indians v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-10-27· cited 14×
• Brown v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1994-12-28· cited 6×
• Venoia Wright v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1995-02-03

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Testan
  Supreme Court· 1976-05-03· cited 3,918×
• United States v. Sherwood
  Supreme Court· 1941-03-31· cited 3,675×
• United States v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 3,342×
• United States v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 2,169×
• Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1967-02-17· cited 1,076×
• White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-27· cited 778×
• Pawnee v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1987-09-28· cited 35×
• Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1990-10-05· cited 29×
• Begay v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1987-08-07· cited 18×