· 8/5/2004
Wright v. Thomas D. Walsh, Inc.
Citations
- 856 A.2d 1108
- 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 414
- 2004 WL 2034992
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to adopt interpretation of statute that “would read into the [statute] a provision that is not there”
- refusing to consider proffered evidence of mootness where the parties had never moved to supplement the record with evidence of it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Terry, Schwelb, Washington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.