Skip to main content
· 6/8/1992

Wright v. Smallwood

Citations

  • 419 S.E.2d 219
  • 308 S.C. 471
  • 1992 S.C. LEXIS 151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring self-insured city to provide UM coverage to employee injured while driving city vehicle
  • explaining governmental immunity under the South Carolina Tort Claims Act did not bar a claim against the governmental entity for UM benefits because UM coverage sounds in contract rather than tort
  • legislative mandate that all automobile insurance “policies” provide uninsurance coverage requires self insurers to provide uninsurance coverage because self insurance is a substitute for an insurance policy
  • City required to provide uninsured motorist coverage for its employees.
  • City required to provide uninsured motorist coverage for its employees.
  • UM claim against self-insured municipality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Harwell, Finney, Toal, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.