Skip to main content
· 7/1/2004

Wright v. Quesnel

Citations

  • 876 So. 2d 362
  • 2004 WL 1471052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that this Court applies a substantial-compliance standard
  • stating that this Court applies a substantial-compliance standard
  • \[w]e have held that the discovery rule applies to the MTCA's statute of limitations\
  • MTCA’s statute of limitations is “subject to a discovery rule” (citing Hayes, 868 So. 2d at 1000); Moore, 825 So. 2d at 667 (“[w]e have held that the discovery rule applies to the MTCA’s statute of limitations” (citing Barnes, 733 So. 2d at 204

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.