· 12/31/1999
Wright v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Citations
- 743 A.2d 1004
- 1999 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 903
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that parolee waived challenge to Board’s recalculation of her maximum sentence date where she failed to file a petition for review from the Board’s order
- holding that parolee waived challenge to Board’s recalculation of her maximum sentence date where she failed to file a petition for review from the Board’s order
- explaining that the recalculation order may only be computed when the parolee is returned to state custody
- explaining that a recommitment order deals with the amount of backtime that will attach “whenever the inmate is returned to state custody”
- holding recalculation orders are final appealable orders
- when backtime falls within presumptive range, the length of backtime is not subject to review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Flaherty, Jiuliante
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.