Skip to main content
· 12/31/1999

Wright v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Citations

  • 743 A.2d 1004
  • 1999 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 903

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that parolee waived challenge to Board’s recalculation of her maximum sentence date where she failed to file a petition for review from the Board’s order
  • holding that parolee waived challenge to Board’s recalculation of her maximum sentence date where she failed to file a petition for review from the Board’s order
  • explaining that the recalculation order may only be computed when the parolee is returned to state custody
  • explaining that a recommitment order deals with the amount of backtime that will attach “whenever the inmate is returned to state custody”
  • holding recalculation orders are final appealable orders
  • when backtime falls within presumptive range, the length of backtime is not subject to review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Flaherty, Jiuliante

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.