Skip to main content
· 12/11/2002

Wright v. Pate

Citations

  • 117 S.W.3d 774
  • 2002 Tenn. App. LEXIS 868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the manner in which a trial judge balances the requirements of adjudicating matters promptly and efficiently while also showing patience, dignity, and courtesy to attorneys and witnesses “is largely left to the judge’s own discretion”
  • ‘“A feeling of ill will or, conversely, favoritism toward one of the parties to a suit are what constitute disqualifying bias or prejudice.”’
  • “Because Appellant has filed no motion for recusal, we must hold that Appellant has waived such right in conjunction with the January 30, 2002 hearing and subsequent Order filed February 13, 2002.”
  • “Because Appellant has filed no motion for recusal, we must hold that Appellant has waived such right in conjunction with the January 30, 2002 hearing and subsequent Order filed February 13, 2002.”
  • “Because Appellant has filed no motion for recusal, we must hold that Appellant has waived such right in conjunction with the January 30, 2002 hearing and subsequent Order filed February 13, 2002.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crawford, Highers, Farmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.