Wright v. Osburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that in joint physical custody scenarios, the district court must \[c] alculate the appropriate percentage of gross income for each parent; subtract the difference between the two and require the parent with the higher income to pay the parent with the lower income that difference\
• statement of Walt Lloyd, Deputy Attorney General, that the “bulk” of S.B. 294 is the UPA, with “some modifications”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rivero v. Rivero
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2009-08-27· cited 100×
• Blanco v. Blanco
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2013-10-31· cited 13×
• Kogod v. Cioffi-Kogod
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2019-04-25· cited 8×
• Roe v. Roe
  Court of Appeals of Nevada· 2023-07-27· cited 8×
• Wesley v. Foster
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2003-03-21· cited 7×
• Miller v. Miller
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-03-15· cited 2×
• Rivero v. Rivero
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-10-30
• MILLER VS. MILLER
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-03-15
• BLUESTEIN VS. BLUESTEIN (CHILD CUSTODY)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2015-03-26
• KOGOD VS. CIOFFI-KOGOD C/W 71994
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2019-04-25

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sprenger v. Sprenger
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-07-26· cited 24×
• Barbagallo v. Barbagallo
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1989-09-21· cited 23×
• Nevada Power Co. v. Public Service Commission
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1989-09-18· cited 5×