Skip to main content
· 8/18/1986

Wright v. Nimmons

Citations

  • 641 F. Supp. 1391
  • 7 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2184
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where a plan is funded by the employer alone the “unbargained for distribution of excess assets to participants represents an unintended windfall for employees”
  • “Common sense dictates that employers which fund plans under ERISA guidelines should not be penalized for overfunding in an abundance of caution or as a result of miscalculation by the actuary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.