Wright v. McKenzie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of wantonness was lacking where the undisputed evidence established that the defendant driver misperceived which lane the other driver was in before pulling out in front of her on the highway
• noting that “Alabama courts have generally held [two speeding tickets] to be insufficient to show a driver’s incompetence”
• noting that “Alabama courts have generally held [two speeding tickets] to be insufficient to show a driver’s incompetence”
• verifying employee’s commercial driver’s license and insurance information was reasonable investigation when no evidence suggested further “investigation would have uncovered proof of [driver’s] incompetence”
• “Wright has not indicated the suspension of his [CDL] was in anyway related to [the defendant’s] competence as a driver . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).