Wright v. Landford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that the comparison of comparables should be achieved by using the “largest and fairest possible sampling of comparable properties,” and remanding where Board failed to include eleven relevant comparables in calculating its ER
• emphasizing that the comparison of comparables should be achieved by using the “largest and fairest possible sampling of comparable properties,” and remanding where Board failed to include eleven relevant comparables in calculating its ER

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).