Skip to main content
· 9/22/1994

Wright v. Kansas Water Office

Citations

  • 881 P.2d 567
  • 255 Kan. 990
  • 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1705
  • 1994 Kan. LEXIS 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding plaintiff s antitrust claims under Kansas law arise out of antitrust statute
  • distinguishing the employment disputes of civil service agents, whose employment arises under statute and is subject to the 3-year statute of limitations, from employment disputes of private parties, whose employment arises under contract
  • discussing nature of Kansas Civil Service Act and Swezey’s interpretation of K.S.A. 75-2949 as requiring “that a valid cause be present to justify termination of a civil service employee”
  • discussing nature of Kansas Civil Service Act and Swezey's interpretation of K.S.A. 75-2949 as requiring \that a valid cause be present to justify termination of a civil service employee\
  • noting Kansas veterans’ preference law creates an implied civil right of action for damages
  • liability under the KSCA is a liability “created by statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.