Skip to main content
· 1/20/2015

Wright v. James City County

Citations

  • 589 F. App'x 186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that keystrokes are not electronic communications for the purpose of the Wiretap Act, but accepting the notion that software could be a device

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Niemeyer, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.