Wright v. Hopper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that inadmissible evidence can still be admissible but “[a] court cannot speculate as to what evidence the defense might have found if the information had been disclosed”
• finding that where testimony was neither suppressed nor material there was no Brady violation
• “Wright provides the court with no explanation or evidence to establish cause and prejudice. Accordingly, the remaining claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are barred from federal habeas review.”
• alterations added; quoting McCoy v. Newsome, 953 F.2d 1252, 1258 (11th Cir. 1992)
• no Brady violation where material was publicly available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).