Wright v. Heizer Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A corporation redeeming its own shares would impair its capital within the meaning of § 160 unless it redeems shares out of ‘surplus’ ”
• \A corporation redeeming its own shares would impair its capital within the meaning of § 160 unless it redeems shares out of 'surplus' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Klang v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1997-12-01· cited 28×
• Matthews v. United States
  M.D. Georgia· 1981-11-19· cited 15×
• Libco Corp. v. Leigh (In Re Reliable Manufacturing Corp.)
  N.D. Illinois· 1981-11-18· cited 8×
• Truserv Corp. v. Bess Hardware and Sports, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-01-21· cited 4×
• TruServ Corp. v. Bess Hardware & Sports, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-01-21

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
  Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 4,586×
• Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-01-21· cited 3,561×
• Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder
  Supreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
• Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.
  Supreme Court· 1970-01-26· cited 1,683×
• City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1974-03-13· cited 1,333×
• Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,218×
• Hall v. Cole
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 1,138×
• F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 1,056×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1974-09-25· cited 366×
• Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. Dasa Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1977-08-11· cited 311×
• Benjamin D. And Madeline Prentice Gilbert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Second Circuit· 1957-09-26· cited 273×
• Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1976-07-02· cited 215×
• Hughes v. Repko
  Third Circuit· 1978-05-12· cited 181×
• Prandini v. National Tea Co.
  Third Circuit· 1978-07-19· cited 179×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,512 Marvyn Gould, of the Estate of J. Donald Rogasner, in No. 75-1338. v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Company, Cross-Appellants
  Third Circuit· 1976-04-08· cited 171×
• Gagne v. Maher
  Second Circuit· 1979-03-09· cited 169×
• Daily v. Zurcher
  N.D. California· 1974-07-17· cited 148×
• The Stanford Daily v. James Zurcher, Individually and as Chief of Police of the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-03-28· cited 133×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,623 Eckart R. Straub v. Vaisman and Company, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation
  Third Circuit· 1976-06-15· cited 128×
• Ramey v. Cincinnati Enquirer, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1974-12-26· cited 116×