Wright v. Hazen Investments, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a lessor and a sublessor were “interested” but not “necessary” parties in litigation between the plaintiff and a sub-lessee
• holding that a lessor and a sublessor were \interested\ but not \necessary\ parties in litigation between the plaintiff and a sublessee
• deciding procedural issue in suit for declaration of ownership of assigned leasehold interest
• ORS 28.110 requires “joinder of all affected interests in order to yield jurisdiction to enter a declaratory judgment”
• “[S]ince plaintiff failed to join [a necessary party], it would appear that the trial court was thereby deprived of jurisdiction to issue a declaratory judgment in this case.”
• “[S]ince plaintiff failed to join [a necessary party], it would appear that the trial court was thereby deprived of jurisdiction to issue a declaratory judgment in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).