Wright v. Greenwood Warehouse Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating {in a one paragraph alternative holding} that the contract was not complete on its face and thus parol evidence was admissible without applying an exception to the parol evidence bar
• \[A] claim for specific performance and a claim for money damages arising out of the same factual context [represent] different causes of action.\
• where the Supreme Court found that the agreement on its face was not complete but was part of a larger transaction and thus allowing parol evidence that such agreement was contingent upon other agreement whose terms were not contradictory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).