Wright v. Eudes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e have questioned whether it is appropriate to automatically apply this ‘relaxed’ standard in every appeal involving an unpreserved sentencing objection.”
• “[A]lmost every other Court of Appeals conducts plain-error review of unpreserved arguments, including unpreserved factual arguments.”
• “Our cases . . . do not purport to shield any category of errors from plain-error review.”
• “The text of Rule 52(b) does not immunize factual errors from plain-error review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).