Wright v. Engum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• quoting/« re Eaton, 110 Wn.2d 892, 901, 757 P.2d 961 (1988)
• “As a rule of statutory interpretation, courts construe statutes to avoid ‘absurd or strained consequences’.”
• courts should read statute as a whole, considering all provisions in relation to each other and giving effect to each provision
• \We do not interpret statutes so as to render any language superfluous.\
• \We do not interpret statutes so as to render any language superfluous.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).