Skip to main content
· 7/27/1899

Wright v. Eastlick

Citations

  • 125 Cal. 517
  • 58 P. 87
  • 1899 Cal. LEXIS 891

Syllabus

<p>New Trial—Misconduct of Jury—Conversation, Drinking, and Carousal with Parties—The misconduct of jurors whose concurrence was essential to the verdict, in conversing about the case with parties to the action, and in drinking and carousing with one of the prevailing parties, is such misconduct as entitles the losing parties to a new trial, irrespective of counter-affidavits that the treating of and drinking with the jurors was indulged in by both parties to the litigation, and that their verdict was uninfluenced by the misconduct complained of.</p>

Judges: Dyke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.