Wright v. Dow Chemical U.S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding once label has been approved by EPA, manufacturer has fulfilled its duty to warn
• explaining that FIFRA does not contemplate preclusion of non-labeling claims, and therefore does not preempt plaintiffs’ claims for defective design and failure properly to test and study pesticides
• FIFRA does not preempt state law regarding nonlabeling claims for defective design and failure to properly test and study
• plaintiff's claims alleging failure to warn and inadequate labeling expressly preempted by FIFRA
• disclaimers of implied warranties ineffective against those who never saw them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).