Skip to main content

Wright v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 239 S.W.3d 63
  • 2007 Ky. LEXIS 246
  • 2007 WL 4139486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant’s directed verdict argument argument was not preserved because of his failure to renew his directed verdict motion at the close of all the evidence
  • holding defendant’s directed verdict argument argument was not preserved because of his failure to renew his directed verdict motion at the close of all the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.