Kentucky Supreme Court· 11/21/2007
Wright v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 239 S.W.3d 63
- 2007 Ky. LEXIS 246
- 2007 WL 4139486
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding defendant’s directed verdict argument argument was not preserved because of his failure to renew his directed verdict motion at the close of all the evidence
- holding defendant’s directed verdict argument argument was not preserved because of his failure to renew his directed verdict motion at the close of all the evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harp v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2008-10-27· cited 154×
- Meece v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 87×
- Commonwealth v. McCombsKentucky Supreme Court· 2010-03-18· cited 18×
- McNeil v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2015-08-20· cited 17×
- Miller v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2013-02-21· cited 8×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 2,553×
- Commonwealth v. BenhamKentucky Supreme Court· 1991-09-26· cited 794×
- Anastasi v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 71×
- Kimbrough v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1977-04-01· cited 66×
- Baker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1998-05-21· cited 45×
- Thacker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.