Wright v. Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e find no warrant for a conclusion that appellants had any vested right which precluded the city from effecting a reasonable adjustment of the controversy over rates . . . . In making that settlement, . . . the consumers were represented by the city.”
• “[W]e find no warrant for a conclusion that appellants had any vested right which precluded the city from effecting a reasonable adjustment of the controversy over rates . . . . In making that settlement, . . . the consumers were represented by the city.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).