· 11/9/1989
Wright v. Brotherhood Bank & Trust Co.
Citations
- 782 P.2d 70
- 14 Kan. App. 2d 71
- 1989 Kan. App. LEXIS 763
- 1989 WL 134785
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an heir at law and executor were sufficiently in privity “so as to be subject to the rule against [claim] splitting.”
- “The rule against splitting causes of action requires that all claims arising out of a single wrong be presented in one action.”
- \The rule against splitting causes of action requires that all claims arising out of a single wrong be presented in one action.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rees, Elliott, Toburen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.