Skip to main content
· 11/9/1989

Wright v. Brotherhood Bank & Trust Co.

Citations

  • 782 P.2d 70
  • 14 Kan. App. 2d 71
  • 1989 Kan. App. LEXIS 763
  • 1989 WL 134785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an heir at law and executor were sufficiently in privity “so as to be subject to the rule against [claim] splitting.”
  • “The rule against splitting causes of action requires that all claims arising out of a single wrong be presented in one action.”
  • \The rule against splitting causes of action requires that all claims arising out of a single wrong be presented in one action.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rees, Elliott, Toburen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.