Wright v. Board of Educ. of City of East Orange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that N.J.S.A. 18A:17-3 did not bar collective negotiations agreement providing tenure rights for fixed-term custodians
• holding that N.J.S.A. 18A:17-3 did not bar collective negotiations agreement providing tenure rights for fixed-term custodians
• although public employees have right to collective bargaining, scope of negotiations is determined by balancing competing interests of government and employees, in order to limit impairment of governmental policy determinations
• although public employees have right to collective bargaining, scope of negotiations is determined by balancing competing interests of government and employees, in order to limit impairment of governmental policy determinations
• mere existence of statute or regulation relating to given term or condition of employment does not automatically preclude negotiation; negotiation is preempted only if the statute or regulation speaks in the imperative and leaves nothing to the discretion of the public employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).