Wright Smith v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning that de Fontbrune may have “led some trial courts to misperceive their role”
• “[I]t is neither novel nor remarkable for a court to accept the uncontradicted testimony of an expert to establish the relevant foreign law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).