Skip to main content
· 11/21/1994

Wright ex rel. Wright v. Illinois Central Railroad

Citations

  • 868 F. Supp. 183
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he Court cannot overlook the unrebutted and sworn assertions that [in-house counsel] has no role whatsoever in [defendant’s] competitive decisionmaking....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.