D. Kansas· 5/11/1995
Wreath v. United States
Citations
- 161 F.R.D. 448
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10278
- 1995 WL 299065
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that a deposition “of any person identified as an expert witness may be taken” under Rule 26(b)(4), regardless of if the expert was retained or specially employed
- noting distinction in Rule 26(b)(4) between experts required to submit Rule 26(a)(2)(B) reports and other experts, such as treating physicians
- “Under Rule 26(a)(2)(A), a party is required to disclose the identity of all persons who may be used at trial to present testimony under Fed. R. Evid. 702, 703, and 705. However, under Rule 26(a)(2)(13
- “The determining issue is the scope of the proposed testimony”
- “The determinative issue is the scope of the proposed testimony.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesSeventh Circuit· 2004-02-19· cited 292×
- Jesse A. Fielden v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 124×
- Leathers v. Pfizer, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2006-03-10· cited 62×
- Nesvig v. NesvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-03-29· cited 38×
- Castro-Medina v. Procter & Gamble Commercial Co.D. Puerto Rico· 2008-06-28· cited 33×
- Daniels v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-11· cited 29×
- Starling v. Union Pacific RailroadD. Kansas· 2001-09-13· cited 26×
- Brown v. Best Foods, A Division of CPC International, Inc.N.D. Alabama· 1996-11-19· cited 26×
- Sprague v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceD. New Hampshire· 1998-01-12· cited 26×
- Kim v. Time InsuranceS.D. Texas· 2008-06-05· cited 23×
- Piper v. Harnischfeger Corp.D. Nevada· 1997-01-17· cited 17×
- Shapardon v. West Beach EstatesD. Hawaii· 1997-04-02· cited 17×
- Thomas v. Consolidated Rail Corp.D. Massachusetts· 1996-10-29· cited 15×
- Coleman v. DydulaW.D. New York· 1999-12-28· cited 14×
- Bekaert Corp. v. City of DyersburgW.D. Tennessee· 2009-03-05· cited 14×
- Kirkham v. Société Air FranceDistrict of Columbia· 2006-04-13· cited 12×
- Gonzalez v. Executive Airlines, Inc.D. Puerto Rico· 2006-03-08· cited 11×
- Riddick v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia· 1998-11-25· cited 11×
- Garcia v. City of Springfield Police DepartmentD. Massachusetts· 2005-08-16· cited 9×
- Structural Preservation Systems, Inc. v. PettyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-06-21· cited 8×
Other cases named Wreath v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.