Wray v. Ice House Ventures, L.L.C.
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 4195
Syllabus
In this appropriation proceeding, the record does not contain any evidence to support the conclusion that the parties mutually agreed that \damages\ meant expectation damages versus damages to the residue and further shows that the parties disagreed on what \damages\ meant. Because there is no evidence of a meeting of the minds on what the parties meant by \damages\, the trial court erred by finding there was an enforceable settlement agreement. Agreed judgment entry vacated, judgment entry granting motion to enforce agreed judgment entry on settlement reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings.
Judges: Beatty Blunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.