Wrangen v. Pennsylvania Lumbermans Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying state law premised on a similar standard and explaining that the inquiry considers what a reasonably prudent person would believe
• “[D]iscovery should ordinarily be allowed under the concept of relevancy unless it is clear that the information sought has no possible bearing on the claims and defenses of the parties or otherwise on the subject matter of the action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).