W.R. Huff Asset Management Co. v. Deloitte & Touche LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an investment advisor lacked standing to sue based on injuries suffered by its clients
• holding that an investment manager to whom investor-clients had given power-of-attorney and authority over investment decisions lacked standing to file a security fraud claim on the clients’ behalf
• holding that an interest in recovering attorney’s fees, alone, is insufficient to create Article III standing
• holding that an interest in recovering attorney’s fees, alone, is insufficient to create Article III standing
• holding that investment advisor lacked standing to bring suit on behalf of its clients where investment advisor “ha[d] not alleged in its complaint that it suffered any injury” but rather “the alleged injury was suffered by [the investment advisor’s] clients”
• stating that a “plaintiff [must] have legal title to, or a proprietary interest in, the claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).