WR Grace & Company-Conn. v. Pyke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming judgment in favor of plaintiff in asbestos personal injury action, but reversing award for loss of future earning capacity
• “The testimony that there was a possibility that [plaintiff] would lose his job was irrelevant, purely speculative and inappropriate.”
• “[T]he proof [of damages] must stand appellate scrutiny as to its sufficiency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).