Woullard, D v. Sanner Concrete

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Winkler’s conveying that, at the time Sodexo was hired, Longwood “was seeing … a significant increase in the number of units that were vacant and needed renovation or refurbishment”
• Winkler’s conveying that, at the time Sodexo was hired, Longwood “was seeing … a significant increase in the number of units that were vacant and needed renovation or refurbishment”
• Winkler’s conveying that, at the time Sodexo was hired, Longwood “was seeing … a significant increase in the number of units that were vacant and needed renovation or refurbishment”
• “Our standard of review in non-jury trials is to assess whether the findings of facts by the trial court are supported by the record and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.”
• “Our standard of review in non-jury trials is to assess whether the findings of facts by the trial court are supported by the record - 81 - J-A29002-22, J-A29006-22, J-A29008-22, J-A29009-22 & J-A29010-22 and whether the trial court erred in applying the law.”
• “Upon appellate review[,] the appellate court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict winner and reverse the trial court only where the findings are not supported by the evidence of record or are based on an error of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Woullard, D v. Sanner Concrete

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Woullard, D v. Sanner Concrete
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-10-30· cited 3×