Fifth Circuit· 3/23/1998
Wottlin v. Fleming
Citations
- 136 F.3d 1032
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5713
- 1998 WL 96765
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a Bureau of Prisons regulation did not violate the Equal Protection Clause by excluding from consideration for a sentence reduction those prisoners whose current conviction may be nonviolent, but who had a prior conviction for a violent offense
- explaining that classifying “inmates based on the type of criminal offenses for which they have been convicted does not implicate a suspect class”
- finding due process claim lacks merit because defendant can identify “no portions of Program Statement 5330.10 that mandate the granting of an early release to an inmate who completes the Program.”
- affirming summary 2 The docket sheets for Petitioner’s criminal cases are available on the Dallas County website at https://www.dallascounty.org/services/record-search/ (last accessed on Oct. 1, 2025
- affirming summary dismissal of § 2241 petition without ordering an answer from respondent
- affirming summary dismissal of § 2241 petition without ordering an answer from respondent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Barksdale, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ricardo Gallegos-Hernandez v. USAFifth Circuit· 2012-07-18· cited 175×
- Warren v. MilesFifth Circuit· 2000-10-13· cited 137×
- Shawn Stauffer v. Marna GearhartFifth Circuit· 2014-01-24· cited 82×
- Charles A. Rublee v. L.E. FlemingFifth Circuit· 1998-11-06· cited 61×
- Royal v. TomboneFifth Circuit· 1998-06-05· cited 55×
- Richardson v. JoslinFifth Circuit· 2007-09-20· cited 51×
- Jose Abel Martinez v. A.M. FlowersTenth Circuit· 1998-12-14· cited 34×
- Gomez v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida· 1998-12-24· cited 33×
- Handley v. ChapmanFifth Circuit· 2009-10-29· cited 29×
- Garcia v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2004-10-18· cited 24×
- Martin v. ChandlerKentucky Supreme Court· 2003-12-18· cited 21×
- Glenn H. Zacher v. J. W. TippyEighth Circuit· 2000-01-28· cited 12×
- Pelissero v. ThompsonFourth Circuit· 1998-09-03· cited 12×
- Charles FURGUIEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael L. BENOV, Warden, Respondent-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1998-08-25· cited 9×
- Guido v. BookerD. Kansas· 1999-02-18· cited 7×
- Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. AgentsD. Colorado· 2009-08-05· cited 7×
- Scroger v. BookerD. Kansas· 1999-02-10· cited 6×
- Bell v. WoodsFifth Circuit· 2010-06-18· cited 6×
- Laws v. BarronE.D. Kentucky· 2004-09-15· cited 4×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2008-10-07· cited 3×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 3,299×
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court· 1983-04-26· cited 3,076×
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 732×
- Anthony Ojo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceFifth Circuit· 1997-03-04· cited 355×
- Hallmark v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1997-07-25· cited 179×
- Smallwood v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1996-01-23· cited 76×
- United States v. TubwellFifth Circuit· 1994-10-24· cited 69×
- Robert C. Stiver v. Warden James Meko, Robert StiverThird Circuit· 1997-11-28· cited 46×
- Scott v. GoordSupreme Court· 1997-12-01· cited 25×
- Shelton v. GudmansonSupreme Court· 1996-10-07· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.