Woskob v. Woskob

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that “[f]or purposes of appellate review, what is not of record does not exist” (citation omitted)
• finding that “a person's support obligation is determined primarily by the parties' actual financial resources and their earning capacity”
• “Where a party assumes a lower paying job or willfully fails to obtain appropriate employment, the support obligation is determined by his assessed earning capacity”
• \[A] person's support obligation is determined primarily by the parties' actual financial resources and their earning capacity.\
• “Although a person’s actual earnings usually reflect his earning capacity, where there is a divergence, the obligation is determined more by earning capacity than actual earnings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).