Worthington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court's denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion must be reversed when no record portions were attached and that the state's attempt to provide the missing documentation by supplementing the record in the appellate proceedings did not cure the defect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McBride v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-08· cited 12×
• Webb v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-12· cited 12×
• Petscher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-23· cited 6×
• Vanderblomen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-24· cited 5×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-22· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smothers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-18· cited 11×
• Saunders v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-11· cited 9×
• Foley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-05· cited 5×
• Hall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-01· cited 2×
• Staggs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-16· cited 1×