Worthington v. Kenkel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to obtain an injunction under Iowa Code section 70A.28(5)(b) against retaliatory discharge from employment, a whistleblower need not show the absence of an adequate remedy at law
• holding that to obtain an injunction under Iowa Code section 70A.28(5)(b) against retaliatory discharge from employment, a whistleblower need not show the absence of an adequate remedy at law
• finding that “the overall scheme of the statute establish[ed] a public policy” and that “injunctive relief expresses the importance of the policy by serving to enforce the law----”
• discussing Iowa Code section 70A.28, Iowa’s parallel whistleblower statute for employees of the State of Iowa
• allowing section 80.15 employee to seek injunctive relief under section 70A.28(5)( b )
• allowing section 80.15 employee to seek injunctive relief under section 70A.28(5)(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).