Skip to main content
· 6/1/1911

Worthington v. Crapser

Citations

  • 63 Wash. 380
  • 115 P. 849
  • 1911 Wash. LEXIS 1210

Syllabus

<p>Husband and Wife — Community Property — Evidence — Sufficiency. Lots purchased by a husband with money received from his father, as an advance from his father’s estate, are his separate property, even if he procured a loan to pay a very small portion of the purchase price, where such portion was too small to notice.</p> <p>Same — Evidence—Admissions. The husband’s petition for letters testamentary on the estate of his wife is not an admission that certain lots which she attempted to dispose of by her will were community property, where she had other property, and the lots in fact belonged to his separate estate.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This Court takes judicial notice of its files.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.