Utah Supreme Court· 7/7/1989
Worthington & Kimball Construction Co. v. C & A Development Co.
Citations
- 777 P.2d 475
- 112 Utah Adv. Rep. 16
- 1989 Utah LEXIS 69
- 1989 WL 73974
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the court held that an amendment which deleted the requirement for a verification on a mechanics' lien would not be applied to a lien filed before its passage
- in confirming arbitration award, court properly denied foreclosure of mechanic's lien after determining that it was not executed according to statutory procedural requirements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham, Hall, Howe, Stewart, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. Copper State Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1990-09-06· cited 28×
- Sure-Shock Electric, Inc. v. Diamond Lofts Venture, LLCColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-06-23· cited 4×
- Portage Park Capital, LLC v. A.L.L. Masonry Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2024-06-14· cited 4×
- First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. StylerD. Utah· 1992-11-06· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Makahuena Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1983-12-23· cited 35×
- Lindon City v. Engineers Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1981-09-21· cited 35×
- International Resources v. DunfieldUtah Supreme Court· 1979-08-21· cited 18×
- First Security Mortgage Co. v. HansenUtah Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 17×
- Mickelsen v. Craigco, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 1989-01-11· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.