Worthen v. Worthen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although ... the final judgment did not make specific findings regarding the award of alimony or the basis of the equitable distribution, this deficiency does not necessarily amount to reversible error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harris v. McKinney
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-09· cited 13×
• BRADLEY ENGLE v. MICHELLE K. ENGLE
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-03

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Esaw v. Esaw
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-05· cited 71×
• Martinez v. Martinez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-19· cited 34×
• Zeller v. Zeller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-04-15· cited 21×

Other cases named Worthen v. Worthen

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Worthen v. Worthen
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1964-01-22· cited 1×