Worthan v. Frink

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “sense of Congress” language in the Free Trade in Information Act was “not law”
• stating that “a sense of Congress resolution is not law”
• requiring the application of a separate 18 analysis for each prong of \willful\ and \malicious\
• requiring the application of a separate 18 analysis for each prong of \willful\ and \malicious\
• upholding licensing requirement for educational travel as content-neutral regulation directed at conduct, noting that right of free speech “can be invoked only to prevent a governmental effort to regulate the content of a professor’s academic speech”
• “[C]on-tent-neutral regulations that have an incidental effect on First Amendment rights will be upheld if they further ‘an important or substantial governmental interest.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).