Skip to main content
· 11/15/2011

Worth v. KORTA

Citations

  • 31 A.3d 804
  • 132 Conn. App. 154
  • 2011 Conn. App. LEXIS 540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence \newly discovered\ for purposes of motion to open if \it could not have been discovered earlier by the exercise of due diligence\ [emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dipentima, Robinson, Bishop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.