Worth, Dennis R. v. Jackson, Alphonso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff who intended to apply for job with allegedly discriminatory hiring policy had “eminently redressable” injury
• noting that the plaintiff's asserted intention to apply for new positions and promotions with the defendant on a regular basis in the future \is just the kind of speculative intention normally insufficient for standing purposes\
• crediting “unchallenged agency affidavit” that government “will not renew” challenged action and concluding that lawsuit was moot
• nonapplicant had standing to assert Title VII claim that employer’s discriminatory hiring policy prevented him from obtaining a position because he alleged that he was going to apply for a job “sometime in the relatively near future”
• applying this rule in the employment context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).