Worsley Restaurants, Inc. v. Speedy's Hamburgers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff failed to satisfy Rule 9(b) because he did not “identify a particular false claim that was submitted to the government for payment by any [d]efendant”
• finding that plaintiff failed to satisfy Rule 9(b) because he did not “identify a particular false claim that was submitted to the government for payment by any [d]efendant”
• finding plaintiff’s NYC FCA claim \deficient\ due to failure to plead grant of authority from Corporation Counsel to sue
• acknowledging that a court may “relax[]” Rule 9(b
• “An attorney’s inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause.” (citation omitted)
• public disclosure bar applies to claims if the information disclosed was sufficient to “set the government squarely upon the trail” of the defendant’s participation in the alleged fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).