Worrie v. Boze

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that separate causes of action existed because \[a]n essential element in the [current] case\ was \absent in the first\
• recognizing that contract rights are property rights
• “[T]he willful and unauthorized destruction of one’s business is ground for imposition of punitive damages against the wrongdoer.”
• “It is well settled that the right to performance of a contract and the right to reap profits therefrom are property rights which are entitled to protection in the courts.”
• loss of business profits treated as an injury to property under Virginia law
• “[I]t is well settled that the right to performance of a contract and the right to reap profits therefrom are property rights which are entitled to protection in the courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).