Worrell v. Roberts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the question of “whether SCE & G’s activities in association with the project exceed[ed] the scope of the definition of excavation in the [statutory] exception” was a question of fact
• stating where conflicting evidence exists as to an issue, the Court’s substantial evidence standard of review defers to the findings of the fact-finder
• stating when conflicting evidence exists as to an issue, the court’s substantial evidence standard of review defers to the findings of the fact-finder
• The meaning of a statutory term is a question of law, but whether a gas and electric company’s activities met this definition is a question of fact.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).