Skip to main content
· 8/10/1979

Worm v. Waconia Farm Supply

Citations

  • 282 N.W.2d 572
  • 1979 Minn. LEXIS 1652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \the 1-year time limitation for bringing an action under K.S.A. 60-1507 begins to run after the period for taking a direct appeal from the [resentencing] expires.\
  • measuring one-year statute of limitations in K.S.A. 60-1507[f] from milestones in criminal case, including resentencing on remand
  • K.S.A. 60-1507 does not permit relief when movant not in custody under sentence being challenged
  • “We have explicitly stated that Rule 183 prohibits simultaneous pursuit of a direct appeal and a motion under K.S.A. 60-1507. [Citation omitted.]”
  • \[T]he 1-year time limitation for bringing an action under K.S.A. 60-1507 begins to run after the period for taking a direct appeal from the [resentencing] expires.\
  • 1-year period to file a motion under K.S.A. 60-1507 begins the date the mandate is issued in the underlying appeal when the movant is in custody under sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Rogosheske, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.